Failed Event Quality Control

It is important to address that I do not endorse a preference toward success or failure, but we view and operationalize both success and failure within the context of growth. Understanding both, realizing their value and checking on their status routinely are responsible quality control practices, as used in production facilities. Indeed, products will certainly fail due to flaws, abnormalities, and other deficits, but these damaged products are monitored, caught and set aside. Collecting data on these failures and identifying trends is helpful, leading to a systematic correction to remedy the flaws and increase the production of products, which is the desired outcome. However, even a highly productive facility realizes that consumers change their minds in the market and seek advancements, increased utility, more capabilities, lower cost, and other improvements. For success in this environment, monitoring for both quality and for the possibilities of improvement are essential habits. When products and services attain a maximum potential for success and are being integrated as a utility for the consumer, i.e. something on which they depend daily, then the opportunity for misuse, and ultimately a downturn in the success is more possible.

Attempting to please everyone, even if you do succeed, ultimately will end in failure of your extended relationships and potentially your own personal goals and aspirations. This approach to personal success can be applied to practically every aspect of life. It is rare to find someone who can please everyone all the time, as well as succeed in every endeavor. And even when this lucky person does succeed, sustaining enduring helpful success is infinitely more challenging than finding and reaching the initial success. On the flip side, enduring success comes with the price of moderation, attending to an ever changing need and the fortitude to maintain quality.