Advice for Getting Published: Be Curious
- Jace Hargis
- Feb 28, 2018
- 1 min read

I would like to share a mid-week SoTL article/blog that I was fortunate to publish in PubFacts this week. It seems that productive scholars find a way to sustain their curiosity to create investigative experiences, which further fosters inquiry. Perhaps asking a Center for Teaching for assistance, which could assist with:
Institutional Review Board(IRB) support to those who need to submit for IRB approval before collecting data on their research;
Models for researching teaching, as in Boyer’s (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered;
Writing Circles, which provide a dedicated time and place for faculty to write, in addition to other insightful, scholarly colleagues (outside of the discipline) who can review and provide suggestions for readability;
New Faculty Writing Programs, which bring new faculty together to help them create a habit of writing as well as provide a quiet, consistent space for writing and at times, reward and recognition programs;
Higher Education Short Courses, which can help identify more efficient (and engaging) instructional approaches, that could open more time for writing; and
Opportunities to mentor other faculty who are new to writing - in this mentoring, just as when reading/reviewing manuscripts, we become better writers.
I appreciate your emphasis on sustaining curiosity to create investigative experiences. It's truly foundational for productive scholarship. Beyond the excellent resources like Writing Circles and IRB support, fostering inquiry often involves diverse methodologies. For scholars whose investigative experiences include visual data collection, having precise control over elements like focus is crucial. Ensuring the clarity and impact of such evidence can be greatly aided by tools that help with optimizing visual data for scholarly inquiry, making every detail count.